Go back to the Global Future home page.
November 5th, 2003

The Court of Last Resort
© Dr. Terry J. van der Werff, CMC

Why it is wise to pay attention to your client's governing board.

The call came at 1:00 p.m. on January 30, 1996: “Can you be on the 3 o'clock flight to Anchorage?” Every consultant knows the only answer is “Yes!” So on it I was.

Why me? Simple, really: a professional referral. The call to facilitate a one-day strategic planning session first came to a fellow member of our Institute of Management Consultants’ breakfast roundtable in Bellevue, Washington, who had been marketing to the company. However, he was a trade expert, so he declined the engagement and suggested they contact me since he knew strategy was my forte.

Little did I know this one call would blossom into 20 or more assignments with a family of companies that lasts to this day, add richness to my practice, and expose me to a plethora of challenges I would not otherwise have encountered.

The client was one of the 13 Alaska Native Regional Corporations. It was a complex, confusing, and conflicting entity—structured as a holding company—with two dozen operating subsidiaries as disparate as construction, plastics manufacturing, tourism, and oil field services. After leading the development of strategic plans for the parent and eight of its subsidiaries, my role was to integrate all the subsidiaries’ plans with the parent’s and with each other’s.

A compelling strategic issue was to restructure the family of companies to meet the parent board’s growth mandate—becoming a billion-dollar company by doubling revenues in five years, while raising profitability. Combining subsidiaries operating in similar arenas was one approach; dismantling or selling subsidiaries was another. Acquiring subsidiaries to strengthen existing capabilities or add new markets was still another. These avenues and more were pursued.

The growth goal was met a year ahead of schedule; the profitability target was not. The senior managements of parent and subsidiaries alike were stretched far too thin.

As the various strategic initiatives played themselves out over the next couple years, it became apparent that one particular subsidiary should be dismantled. Two of its three disparate divisions would be transferred to sister companies. The third would be sold outright. A suitor, already waiting in the wings, had a representative on the subsidiary’s board.

I was present at the memorable final board meeting of this subsidiary. The main agenda item, of course, was to disband the company. The reasons for doing so and the practicalities of the transfers and sale were laid out clearly by senior management. A full discussion followed, including suggestions of other options that might work. In the end, the board voted unanimously on the motion to disband the company.

Afterward, I talked casually with two board members who remarked they were looking forward to the next board meeting, originally slated to be at a location known for fine fishing. When I told them there was no such meeting because they had just voted the company out of existence, they were dumbfounded: “Nah, we didn’t do that! Did we?” Oh, yes, you did!

I was astonished, though tried not to show it, feeling there was no point in talking about it then and there.

After discussing the matter with the parent corporation’s leaders, I came to realize it was not the board members’ fault. Though good and decent men, they were neither selected for nor educated regarding their fiduciary roles, nor trained in how to exercise them. They played at being board members, going through the motions without understanding the rules of the game. They did not fully comprehend that they were, in fact, the court of last resort and their decisions were final.

As a confidential advisor to CEOs on strategy, I work with boards on essentially every assignment. Most comprise men and women of goodwill and experience having a command of the issues and offering sound advice. My memorable experience, however, taught me three useful lessons:

 
Pay attention to governance, even when not part of the project's scope.
Do not presume all board members are fully aware of the roles they play and responsibilities they bear.
It helps to know how various members came to be on a board and why they’re there.

 

 


van der Werff Global, Ltd.
Phone: 1-888-44-TERRY (448-3779)      Fax: 1-888-4-FAX-2-ME (432-9263)
E-mail:

Home | What's New | Global Future Reports™ | Book Reviews | Bibliographies | Contact Us
Futurist | Consultant | Speaker | Trends | Scenarios | Planning

WEBSITE DESIGN BY NEW TECH WEB, INC.