Go back to the Global Future home page.
May 1st , 2000

Scenario-Based Decision Making - Case Studies
© Dr. Terry J. van der Werff, CMC

Two case studies using scenario sketching for decision making.

Last week I made the argument for using scenarios as a decision making technique, rather than as an ongoing planning methodology.  Let me illustrate this technique through two case studies.

Case 1 (1995) - National Specialty Retailer

In 1995 this specialty retailer had about 40 stores spread across the United States.  They were exceptionally well managed and had generated double digit annual growth rates in both revenues and profits for several decades.  Annual revenues were about $500 million.  The CEO wanted to expose his management team to a new planning method for one year that was different from their well honed, rolling five-year plan that served them so well.  The clear expectation was that at the end of the year, the company would revert to their existing planning methodology. In essence, he wanted them to take a step off the treadmill for a year.

The question developed (with considerable difficulty) at the two-day kickoff retreat was "How do we position ourselves to be a $5 billion company in our industry by 2013?"

We worked together for six months - the CEO, his senior team of a dozen folks, and the Board - to develop three scenarios.  One scenario was built around technology, another around life style, and the last around competition.  The CEO stated there were creative strategies that came out of each of the scenario teams that probably would not have arisen through their traditional planning.

But one strategy stood out.

The Web was just starting to rear its head in 1995, and a few retailers were beginning to put their catalogs on-line.  This didn't seem to fit the culture or business model of this company, yet it was clear that something was needed.  The technology scenario painted a rich, pervasive technology infrastructure that would facilitate all kinds of interaction worldwide, both business and personal.

The stroke of genius was the CEO's.  He finally asked, "What would our Internet initiative look like if it were a store?"  The room fell silent, for everyone around the table knew the company was good at opening stores in new places.  Their mindset instantly shifted from an unfamiliar technology to simply another new location.  The CEO asked for and got a business plan in hardly more than a week.  He approved the initiative and appointed the first employee of the new Internet store - the store manager.  The Internet store was not put into the hands of the IT department, but into those of a seasoned store manager who was given full P&L responsibility.

Four years later their Internet store stands fifth or sixth in sales revenue amongst its now 50+ stores across the country and has been profitable since its inception.

Did this company develop the three scenarios further and set up a tracking and review system to decide when and what actions to take.  No, they came out of the half-year scenario process with a particular strategy, a single decision to address an issue that wasn't even the focal point for the scenarios!

Case 2 (1999) - Credit Union League

This Credit Union League is the (nonprofit) trade association for the 200 or so credit unions in their state.  Credit unions are facing enormous changes.  The financial services industry is blurring the traditional lines that once separated companies and organizations into well-defined sectors.  In the words of the League's CEO, "We are living in an era of hyperchange."

The question developed (with relatively quick consensus) at their annual board retreat was "How do we position the League as the premier interstate and international leader in 2010?"

In one afternoon - the CEO, a few senior managers, and a small Board - sketched three scenarios.  One was built around technology, another around image, and the last around competition.  (Technology and competition are hardy perennials as driving forces!)  Several creative strategies came out of each scenario that the CEO and his team are now considering for implementation.  But again one strategy stood out.

Credit union leagues are organized for one state alone.  The two themes that ran through the three scenario teams' implications and responses were to provide expanded services to credit unions within its own state and to take these beyond its borders.  By the end of the afternoon the participants had shifted their mindsets from the posed question which implied they wanted simply (!) to be the best and shifted them towards being a credit union league that spanned several states with a single organization.

The major impact, unplanned and unspoken, was to build support for a novel idea the CEO had already been thinking about, but which had not been voiced at the retreat.  His senior team (as this is written) is fleshing out a strategy to expand the League to embrace credit unions in several states, in competition with existing leagues perhaps, but more likely through acquisition or consolidation.  This is a bold initiative, flying in the face of tradition within the very conservative, stable credit union movement environment.

Decision making, not planning.  There you have it!  Two quite different companies - one for profit, the other nonprofit - and two radically different timeframes - six months versus one afternoon.  Neither pursued scenario planning beyond the project.  Yet, each found a superb strategy through the scenario process and made the important decision to pursue it, even though neither was a direct answer to the question they posed.

The Internet store strategy clearly has been a smashing success.  The regional credit union league initiative is still under development.

In the real world, most companies use scenarios as aids to decision making, not as an ongoing planning methodology.  The value lies not in the scenarios, but in the discipline of thinking creatively about the future.  Recognizing this, you should help put this creative tool of sketching scenarios into the toolkit of every manager in your company.  It will enrich their thinking and make them more nimble, better decision makers.

Could you benefit from using scenarios for decision making in your company?

Contact us.  We would be delighted to assist you.

 

 


van der Werff Global, Ltd.
Phone: 1-888-44-TERRY (448-3779)      Fax: 1-888-4-FAX-2-ME (432-9263)
E-mail:

Home | What's New | Global Future Reports™ | Book Reviews | Bibliographies | Contact Us
Futurist | Consultant | Speaker | Trends | Scenarios | Planning

WEBSITE DESIGN BY NEW TECH WEB, INC.